The recent violence in South Asia once again underscores the dangerous volatility of the region’s geopolitical landscape. The tragic attack in Pahalgam and the subsequent escalation of tensions between India and Pakistan highlight the deep-rooted mistrust that continues to plague bilateral relations. While backdoor diplomacy and international mediation helped prevent a broader conflagration, the region’s long-term peace and stability hinge on sustained, sincere dialogue between Islamabad and New Delhi.
Pakistan’s concerns about the Pahalgam incident were not acted upon swiftly or effectively. Had diplomatic channels been utilized in a timely and transparent manner, the tragic loss of life may have been averted. This failure points to a broader communication gap between the two nations — one that has allowed suspicion and hostility to fill the void left by dialogue. Both governments must work to rebuild those channels and institutionalize mechanisms for rapid information sharing, particularly in moments of crisis.
Another looming issue that demands urgent attention is the future of the This agreement, vital to Pakistan’s agriculture, food security, and water supply, cannot be taken for granted. India’s shifting stance and infrastructure developments on western rivers have raised serious questions in Islamabad. Pakistan must seek clarity and firm commitments through diplomatic engagement, as any unilateral disruption of this treaty could have devastating consequences for the region.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres rightly noted that the ceasefire must be a stepping stone to resolving broader, long-standing issues between the two nations. Chief among them is the Kashmir dispute — a conflict that has endured for over seven decades and remains the most dangerous flashpoint in South Asia. The events of recent weeks serve as a grim reminder that Kashmir is not a dormant issue; it is a simmering conflict that, if left unaddressed, could ignite hostilities at any time.
While foreign actors have played a constructive role in easing tensions, it is unrealistic to expect the international community to shepherd India and Pakistan toward lasting peace. Third parties can create conducive conditions, but the responsibility to engage, compromise, and resolve lies squarely with Islamabad and New Delhi. Both nations must summon the political will and maturity to reimagine their relationship, moving beyond cycles of blame and brinkmanship.
In the absence of a structured peace process and honest engagement, South Asia will remain hostage to the ghosts of history. Dialogue may be difficult, but the alternative is far worse — a future marred by recurring violence, mistrust, and missed opportunities. It is time for both countries to take ownership of peace.
