Pakistan’s pursuit of closer ties with the Asian Development Bank highlights the country’s increasing need for long-term, affordable development funding as well as its dependence on international lenders to support a fragile economy. The meeting between ADB President Masato Kanda and Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb for policy-based lending and increased cooperation in key areas seems to be as much a request for new funding from the lender as it is for technical assistance in creating creative financing tools to investigate global debt markets and raise additional capital. The bank’s wish list for financial support and its cooperation in market-based financing products, such as debt-for-nature swaps, blended finance, and green bonds, show both ambition and a desperate search for new funding sources in the face of declining bilateral official and private flows. Beyond the current IMF funding package, a sustained commitment to structural, budgetary, and governance change is the true problem, not debt mobilization.

However, the excruciatingly sluggish progress in crucial areas like energy, taxes, and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) undermines public trust in the government’s resolve to implement reforms. It is comforting that the ADB chief has reiterated his support for Pakistan at a time when the two countries are negotiating the specifics of the 10-year Country Partnership Strategy (2026–35) based on a comparable $20 billion World Bank initiative. The bank’s trust in Pakistan’s medium-term course is shown by this fact, but it also highlights Pakistan’s growing reliance on its multilateral partners to provide significant funding for its development and economic stability. Without a question, the ADB has had a significant impact on Pakistan’s economic development in recent decades.

However, the nation’s recent experience with the bank—or other international organizations, for that matter—demonstrates that such a relationship cannot succeed without real reforms and competent administration. The recent hard-won macroeconomic stabilization—inflation is down, the current account is improving, and foreign rating upgrades are anticipated to lower borrowing costs—is something Mr. Aurangzeb is correct to emphasize. However, unless the long-standing productivity and governance improvements are implemented more quickly, these gains will remain precarious. Furthermore, Islamabad risks losing the goodwill it has earned internationally over the last several years if it does not consistently demonstrate its commitment to strong governance and economic management practices.

The partnership, however, also highlights a growing dependency. While the ADB’s generous annual commitment of over $2 billion is a welcome relief for a cash-strapped economy, it also underscores Pakistan’s reliance on multilateral lenders. To move toward genuine self-sufficiency, Pakistan must continue to implement the structural reforms it has promised, including tax reforms and the restructuring of state-owned enterprises. The ADB’s role is to facilitate, but the onus of creating a robust, self-sustaining economy lies with Pakistan’s leadership and people. It is a shared journey, and the ADB’s continued support provides a crucial foundation upon which to build a prosperous and resilient Pakistan for generations to come.