In times of heightened tension, the media has a critical responsibility: to inform the public with clarity, accuracy, and restraint. Yet, in the face of conflict — particularly one between nuclear-armed neighbours like India and Pakistan — many media outlets appear to abandon these principles in favour of jingoistic spectacle. The recent coverage by several Indian news channels during military tensions with Pakistan is a troubling case in point.
Prime-time broadcasts aired with feverish excitement claims that defied all credibility — from Islamabad having fallen to Lahore being under siege. Reports of Peshawar bombings, Karachi ports in flames, and Pakistani leadership surrendering were not only unfounded but shockingly reckless. One channel even paraded ‘experts’ who gleefully announced a ground invasion of Pakistan, despite no such operation being officially acknowledged. Such displays cross the line from poor journalism into dangerous misinformation.
It is often said that truth is the first casualty of war, but here, it feels more like a targeted execution. While the fog of war can complicate accurate reporting, actively contributing to that fog — rather than dispelling it — is a gross dereliction of journalistic duty. Sensationalism may boost ratings, but at what cost?
Pakistan’s media, though not without its own flaws, has at least faced public criticism and pressure to self-correct. A level of skepticism remains among Pakistani audiences, who frequently turn to independent or international sources for reliable coverage. It’s worth asking whether similar accountability exists across the border, where theatrical nationalism seems to be mistaken for credible reporting.
Worryingly, reports suggest that Indian authorities have coerced major social media platforms into silencing dissent and blocking thousands of accounts to control the narrative. This raises serious concerns about press freedom in what is often touted as the world’s largest democracy. When propaganda is cloaked as news and dissent is muzzled, it becomes easier to manipulate public sentiment — and harder to de-escalate conflict.
Media on both sides must reflect on their role in either fuelling or defusing crises. Nationalism has its place, but not in the newsroom. The job of journalists is not to wave the flag, but to hold power accountable, verify facts, and serve the public interest — especially in times of war. Anything less endangers lives and peace.
As tensions simmer, the need for responsible journalism has never been more urgent. Media must resist the urge to inflame, and instead strive to inform.