Uzair Ahmed khan
The opinion was not given and the question of stopping the deviation in the future was sent back to the President by the court.
When a fisherman hunts a fish and a big fish get caught in his net, he does not bring it to shore or inside his boat or on the shore, but he gets caught in the net but puts it in the water. Tadam dies openly, she does not fish, she does not stay strong, and she keeps hitting to get out of the net, but in the end, she loses her courage and becomes exhausted, when she loses her strength. Then the fisherman drags him out of the sea, something like this is happening in today’s politics, two hunters are very important in this, one is Captain Imran Khan and the other is Asif Ali Zardari, Asif Ali Zardari Misdaq has made fish and brought it in PTI’s net, and now they are feeding the fish that is trapped in Imran Khan’s net in the water, the fish has reached the point of death, now it is not out of the sea. Able to come, not able to live in the sea, we have been trying to make one thing believe from day one that Asif Ali Zardari has played a game with PML-N but maybe PML-N does not understand this. What is the real game, let’s go back a little bit to the past when Asif Ali Zardari was arrested during the PML-N era, and then his tongue was cut out. All these things are known to everyone. Maryam Nawaz says that we have a coalition government, we can’t make any big decision alone, with all parties. Come on, we have a question for them here that Imran Khan was ruling well then why did he bother to govern, they used to say that petrol will be cheaper, electricity will be cheaper, load shedding will end but nothing. It was better than Imran Khan lived and the time to come was N-League, but Zardari should be applauded here, that is why it is said that Asif Ali Zardari has a Ph.D. in politics, and maybe Nawaz Sharif also sensed the situation. He did not return home, he also bluntly said that all the coalition parties should decide together or go to the polls, now the Supreme Court has decided regarding the deviant members according to Art Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Pakistan gave its opinion on the presidential reference of 63A. The court referred the question of stopping the deviation in future to the President Dr. Arif Alvi. The opinion said that if the deviant member of the Assembly were given against the party policy, the vote would not be counted while the term of lifelong disqualification or disqualification would be decided by the Parliament. A five-member bench headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Umar Ata Bandial heard the presidential reference regarding the interpretation of Article 63A and the verdict was pronounced in a ratio of 3 to 2. Chief Justice Omar Atabandial, Justice Ejaz-ul-Haq, and Justice Muneeb Akhtar said that the vote of the deviant member should not be counted while Justice Mazhar Alam Mian Khel and Justice Mandokhel disagreed. Justice Mazhar Alam and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel disagreed with the majority decision. It was said in the minority opinion that the results given in Article 63A are sufficient. If anyone deviates, his seat will be considered vacant after being de-seated. Mian Khel, Justice Muneeb Akhtar, and Justice Jamal Mandokhel were part of the larger bench. Are The purpose of Article 63-A is to prevent deviation? The essence of Article 63-A is that no member of a political party has to deviate. The purpose of Article 63-A is to protect the parties’ fundamental rights. The vote of a deviant member will not be counted. The vote cast against party policy will not be counted. The opinion was not given and the question of stopping the deviation in the future was sent back to the President by the court. Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial has said that a detailed decision will be issued later. Earlier, a five-member larger bench headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial heard the presidential reference. Ashtar Osaf questioned the admissibility of the presidential reference. Justice Ejaz-ul-Haq said that the President does not need to seek a legal opinion from the Attorney General for reference. After the failure of the former Prime Minister did not issue any instructions. Justice Ejaz-ul-Hassan said that it was up to the party chief to issue instructions or not.
The Attorney General said that the former Prime Minister deviated from his earlier position. The Prime Minister cannot change his word under oath but betrayal is a great crime. What will happen if a Prime Minister does not fulfill his promises? Justice Ejaz-ul-Hassan said that in this case Let the members resign, it is a terrible punishment for treason. The Chief Justice said that if anyone has any objection against the Prime Minister, then leave the Parliament. The court reserved its decision on completion of the hearing. Presidential Reference It should be noted that during the hearing on the presidential reference in the Supreme Court, the lawyers of the political parties presented their arguments.
March 18, 2022: March 21, 2022: President Arif Alvi approves the reference for the interpretation of Article 63A. March 21, 2022: Supreme Court decides to form a 5-member larger bench for interpretation of Article 63A. March 22, 2022: Supreme Court approves reference for the interpretation of Article 63A. A five-member larger bench comprising Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Ejaz-ul-Haq, Justice Muneeb Akhtar, Justice Mazhar Alam, and Justice Jamal Khan was formed. March 24, 2022: What was the opinion of the President? In the presidential reference filed by the President, the opinion was sought from the Supreme Court on four questions. No action can be taken against him? Can’t it be de-seated?
The Supreme Court was asked whether the votes of members who deviate from the party policy and vote against the policy will be counted. The Supreme Court was asked whether If a member changes his allegiance and goes against the party policy and it is proved that he has violated Article 63A, will he be disqualified for life?
The horse-trading and floor crossing What steps can be taken in the current constitutional framework to stop the floor crossing, now that the federal and Punjab governments have moved to the red zone, Shahbaz Sharif has 169 members, to keep them standing The situation in Punjab is no different.
The next Chief Minister will be Pervez Elahi. The President will soon ask the Prime Minister and the Chief Minister of Punjab to take a vote of confidence. Digestion.
