The discontent with the president of the country is growing in Armenia. The demands for his resignation sound more loudly, and not only from political opposition. It also isn’t surprising, that during the rule of S. Sargsyan the only observation made is – strengthening of the criminal and oligarchical mode in which the role of “the main oligarch” is played by the president.
War criminals on a political scene: However, the experience of mankind prompted that the person who is actually war criminal should not be allowed to lead the country. After all, as well as his predecessor on the president’s post Robert Kocharyan, the Sargsyan actually came to the power at the price of many human lives, both in Azerbaijan, and in Armenia, sacrificed to the Karabakh war.
It worth to recollect the cynical words of Sargsyan concerning tragic events in the Azerbaijani city of Khojaly provided in the book of the British journalist Tomas de Vaal “A black garden”: “Before Khojaly Azerbaijanis thought that it is possible to make jokes with us, they thought that Armenians aren’t capable to raise a hand against the civilian population. We managed to break this stereotype”. As the author of the book concludes, “… this massacre was, let at least and partly, the deliberate act of intimidation”.
Subsequently “acts of intimidation” were arranged already in Armenia. And the execution in the Armenian parliament on October 27, 1999 which is actually organized by the then president Robert Kocharyan and his accomplice holding a post of the minister of National Security S. Sargsyan for the purpose of elimination of the opponents on a political scene became one of the most resonant.
9 years later the brother of the last, Sashik Sargsyan, confirmed participation of Kocharyan and the brother in the specified crime. Reported about it on February 8, 2008 the Russian agency “Regnum” with reference to the Armenian newspaper “Aikakan Zhamanak” on which pages it was noted that Sashik Sargsyan at the end of 2007 “… in St. Petersburg … in presence of tens of people declared “We did not kill so many people in parliament so that to simply hand over the power to another”.
Subsequently the same newspaper noted that Sashik Sargsyan’s statement caused big noise, but wasn’t disproved. After that, wrote the edition, “Serge sent the brother on other hemisphere that he didn’t blurt out something before the termination of elections in Armenia. Now he is in Los Angeles”. “But how the nouveau riche Sashik who became thanks to the brother the millionaire can keep client? When he was asked in Los Angeles whether really spoke so Sashik in response literally stated “I am not a donkey to say it… Why we have to assume Rob’s sins (the president of Armenia Robert Kocharyan) ?” – the newspaper noted.
Events on March 1, 2008 when, according to an assessment of the Armenian journalist of the ilur.am online edition Pargev Apresyan, “the price of ten victims, hundred wounded and political prisoners SerzhSargsyan managed to take away a political victory from the people” became the following “the intimidation act”. This quote is from Apresyan’s article “Revanchism and an inferiority complex of the president: Serzh Sargsyan missed again” of January 9, 2013 which testifies that the Armenian society can’t still recover from this psychological trauma.
“Do you remember April 9, 2008? – the author questions. – Serzh Sargsyan’s inauguration. Small center of Yerevan completely deserted and surrounded by police, empty streets and he alone is going through ranks of guard to the Opera where there had to take place a ceremony. He was accompanied only by a small cellophane package driven by a wind which that was confused at it in feet, fluttered over the head, marking all ridiculous tragedy of a situation. Demonstration of was the only purpose of its pedestrian pass on Freedom Square that it goes on “the
flame center” where there were people – his opponents who haven’t accepted published results of elections, not accepted him as president. It was the demonstrative action which the lost Serzh Sargsyan tried to psychologically take vengeance on the people who have won it. Then probably Serzh Sargsyan didn’t understand that he will remain alone, and only empty cellophane packages accompanying his march of “victory” will be increasing greatly.
Can’t adapt: For last years Sargsyan couldn’t adapt to the new role – head of state, on what the above author also pays attention. “The discomfort, the inconvenience tested by him at communication with people is obvious. And these signs were very imperceptible when he held a position of the Minister of Defense. And over the last 5 years they are simply obvious. It shows that he doesn’t feel on the place, a position, to put it mildly, not for him. He suffers a complex of presidential inferiority”.
Trying to solve a problem of protest moods in society, Sargsyan continued policy of power suppression of the opponents. “For this purpose he didn’t feel sorry for anything – neither an administrative resource, nor retaliatory mechanisms”, – Apresyan emphasizes. He also specifies that at the subsequent presidential election of 2013 Sargsyan passionately wanted to get rid of an inferiority complex, however boycott of elections by opposition didn’t let to him to feel the real winner. Final words of the journalist sound as if a sentence on behalf of all Armenian society: “Not elected President can’t conduct the people anywhere. And fight not only proceeds, but also gains new strength”.
According to analysts of other Armenian edition – the newspaper “Zham”, “actually, it is possible to claim that Serzh Sargsyan doesn’t care not only public opinion, but also opinion of the narrow circle around him”. In “Why Serzh Sargsyan Makes Decisions Alone” article of the edition that was reprinted by a known site inosmi.ru, it is noted that ” the president have serious complexes on adoption of independent decisions”.
“Probably, many say to S. Sargsyan that he can’t work as the President and proceeding from this complex this person tries to prove to all and everyone that is capable to make independent decisions, – “Zham” notes. – However as this person doesn’t read neither books, nor newspapers, he has no created geopolitical representations on this or that question. And it isn’t casual that while visiting USA as Minister of Defense he declared that in Karabakh there is a war “between Christians and Muslims”.
Long time, staying as the president, it worked according to a known Russian saying – “be silent, and for the clever you will descend”. Also it is notable that due to this tactics no one knew the “real” Sargsyanduring the tenures of first and second presidents of Armenia. Whereas, having become the president, he showed the qualities quickly enough.
It became clear that he is capable to make decision on the most difficult issue of the Armenian-Turkish relations in one night, in one day to depreciate Armenian currency dram for 25 percent, and at last for four years claim to be pro-western and in four days to make the extremely pro-Russian decision. So can behave only the antisocial figure.
“The main oligarch”: It is not secret for anybody in Armenia that the main role in the criminal oligarchical system created in the country belongs to Sargsyan. As the Armenian analyst Karen Akopdzhanyan in the article “Natural Opponents” of the July 29, 2014, published by the Armenian online edition 7or.am, Sargsyan who is surrounded by his relatives and child-hood friends owns Armenian economy.
As the author specifies, “till 2007 in Armenia business layers were created. There was an extensive development. What was unfair with that this system that capable and talented people could become only mediocre businessmen, however the way to larger business that was owned 20-30 families (which were supervised by S. Sargsyan by the way) or criminal financial groups was closed for them.
The system of three layers of business for certain period provided some economic growth during Robert Kocharyan’s presidency. It is clear that in society there was a requirement to reform clan oligarchical system. What Serzh Sargsyan after emergence in the presidential palace undertook supervising so-called oligarchs? He went by not reforms, but transformation of clan and oligarchical system in super oligarchical and introductions in Armenia of neobolshevist system of board which was named by all “anti-oligarchical fight”.
At first by means of Tigran Sargsyanhe subjected small business to tax terror, then began large-scale process of repartition of property: emigration, economy recession, poverty growth, trebling of an external debt, capital flight, etc. ” The Armenian analyst don’t doubt that preservation of the specified tendencies conducts to accident which can endanger statehood of Armenia. For this reason he considers necessary “to provide broad public consolidation, to create the joint front against Serzh Sargsyan, to reject boards providing neobolshevist system the constitutional changes and to go for power change. Otherwise the future of state, without exaggeration, will appear in doubt.
“Armenia without Serzh Sargsyan” – this should be a main slogan of the forthcoming processes. It is necessary to provide to “the last Bolshevik” “a humanitarian corridor” and to turn the page of his disgraceful board”, – Akopdzhanyan emphasizes.
However analysts don’t exclude also other option of succession of events at which protest moods in Armenia will reach such level when nobody will already speak about “a humanitarian corridor” and Sargsyan should be responsible personally for all crimes against the Armenian people. The history abounds with examples of what fate usually expects tyrants.
Since you are doing CD3 BW with your RE next
isabel marant boots Fashion in Toronto and Freeds new fashion house Condo
canada goose outletAmazing Dining Experience At The Restaurants In Mexico