Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) is witnessing a surge in civil unrest as a broad coalition of civil society groups and political parties successfully staged a strike against a controversial ordinance aimed at regulating public gatherings. This comes after AJK President Barrister Sultan Mehmood approved a presidential ordinance last month that imposed stringent punishments for ‘illegal’ public assemblies, rallies, and protests.
The ordinance, mirroring the Public Order and Peaceful Assembly Act of 2024 enacted by the federal government in September, grants extensive authority to the administrative apparatus to approve or reject public gatherings and impose severe penalties for non-compliance. Despite the AJK Supreme Court’s suspension of the ordinance, the public’s resolute response to the strike call demonstrates their deep-seated concern for their civil liberties.
The Jammu & Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee, the same coalition that spearheaded large-scale protests earlier this year, is at the forefront of this movement. They demand the complete repeal of the ordinance, asserting that it compromises fundamental rights. The success of their recent strike underscores their growing influence and the public’s willingness to support their cause.
This escalating tension between the AJK government and its people highlights the delicate balance between maintaining order and safeguarding individual liberties. The government’s attempts to exert control over the region have ignited strong resistance from the public, raising concerns about potential future confrontations.
As the situation unfolds, it is imperative for decision-makers to exercise caution and engage in dialogue with the AJK public. Addressing their concerns with restraint and respecting their fundamental rights is crucial to prevent further escalation and ensure a peaceful resolution to this growing crisis.
The recent strike in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) against a controversial ordinance is a stark reminder of the growing discontent among the people of the region. The government’s attempts to curtail civil liberties through restrictive laws have sparked widespread protests and civil disobedience.
The ordinance, which grants the administration sweeping powers to regulate public gatherings, is seen as a direct assault on the fundamental rights of the people. It has raised concerns about the erosion of democratic principles and the potential for misuse of power. The public’s strong response to the strike call demonstrates their determination to protect their freedoms and resist authoritarian tendencies.
The AJK government must heed the people’s demands and repeal the ordinance immediately. Continuing with such repressive measures will only deepen the divide between the government and the people. It is essential to foster a climate of dialogue and understanding, where the concerns and aspirations of the people are taken seriously.
The international community should also take note of the situation in AJK. It is crucial to support the people’s struggle for democracy, human rights, and self-determination. By raising awareness and advocating for peaceful resolution, the international community can play a vital role in ensuring that the rights of the people of AJK are upheld.
